Hello, my friends! This is Moah, Tech Lead of Stellaris typing. I can finally talk about what youve all been waiting for: How many new platypi will there be in Federations? After weeks of Well, apparently, I should be "more technical." But before we jump into the mysteries of the Stellaris code, I want to take the time to talk a little about the balance between adding new features, improving performance and stability especially in terms of multiplayer and the dreaded out-of-syncs (dreaded at least by me).

The Delicate Balance

Stellaris, like most decently sized code bases, is like a complex game of Mikado or Jenga: every part is connected in some way to every other part. When you add a feature, you add more connections. If youre careful, you add only a few, if youre in a rush you add a bit too many. This generally leads to Unplanned Features (aka bugs). In addition, once we see them perform in the actual game, we tend to expand features in new, unexpected ways, leading to more Unplanned Features(tm). Once we realize what is happening, we start being more careful. Maybe too careful. Checking too many things, too often, ensuring that this interaction that is supposed to never actually happen is actually not happening. Not now, not later. Not ever. So you have removed the unplanned features, but the game is a bit, ah too careful. Some would say slow. So you remove some of these checks. You realize that you dont need to loop around the galaxy, you can just loop around this one tiny planet. Then you go one step further, and think well I can maybe do that check only every three weeks, and this calculation needed by all these checks, I could store it in here and reuse it until the next time it changes. So now the game isnt so careful anymore, were back in unplanned feature territory. But if the caching (storing/reusing calculations) happens at different times on different machines, you get slightly different results (like asking a developer for something before and after they had coffee). Slightly different results are what OOS thrives on! Clients and servers have 0.0001 cost difference, compounded over time, that corvette is bought on the server but not on the client. So you remove your smart algorithm. You replace it with the correct algorithm. You lose half of what you gained in step 2 and reintroduce some bugs. Probably. Rinse and repeat. But enough about my morning routine! Lets talk about

Performance

Stellaris fans are like C++ programmers: performance is always on their mind. To be fair, it has also been on ours a lot lately. We know that its not all that it could be, especially in late game and with the bigger galaxies. With that in mind, weve taken time to improve performance in a bit more depth than we usually can. We looked at what was taking the most time, and as everyone knows that is

Pops.

There are many reasons why pops consume a lot of time in Stellaris, but the main one is that by endgame we have SO MANY of them. SO So so so so many. And they do so much! Pops have to calculate how good theyd be at every job (they do so every 7 days). Then they have to fight every other pop on the planet to get the job theyre best at. They also have to check if they could have a specific ethic. If they could join a specific faction. How happy they are. How happy they could be. How happy they would be on that planet over there. All these things trigger modifiers calculations. If you remember my last dev diary, you know that modifiers are the only thing more numerous than Pops in Stellaris. And they all depend on each other. Calculating them is like pulling on a thread and getting the whole sweater.

OK, but what did we actually do about it?

Well first, Ill admit I may have been a bit pigheaded on the whole we need to do the jobs distribution every day because we dont know when new jobs are added. We reexamined this assumption, and jobs distribution is now only done on demand. It was also rewritten to iterate over a lot fewer things. We also noticed a few triggers going through every pop of an empire to check if one or more are enslaved, decadent, or other things that can be tested at the species level. So we made new triggers to test these things at the species levels. In the same spirit, we had events going through every ship to find a fleet, so we added triggers at the fleet level. Second, Weve also reworked the approach to checking if pops can change ethics (and also made it work again), or if they can join factions. Finally, weve looked for (and found) opportunities to use more multi threading. But enough talk! Whats the result? Well, if a picture is worth a thousand words, heres the answer at 30000 words a second: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SFE89Wj8go&feature=emb_title The video compares the performance of 2.5.1 Shelley to 2.6 Verne'' when running a save game from the community, which can be found attached to this post, with over 20000 pops. It was recorded on my work computer (Intel Core7-7900X @ 3.30Ghz, 10 cores and 20 threads, and AMD R9 Fury). You wont necessarily get the same results, the exact difference in performance will vary with your computer, and the exact situation in your own save games, of course. On average, weve found something between 15% and 30% improvement in late game situations. This save is just ideal to showcase the impact of the pops improvement. You wanna find out more about the performance improvements? Have a read here !

[ 2020-02-20 12:16:10 CET ] [ Original post ]